Muslims believe that Christians falsified and destroyed the real Bible, often asserting that this occurred at The Council Of Nicea in 325 AD.
Some Muslims believe that the supposed original, real Bible, which supports the teaching of The Qu’ran, was discovered in the year 2000 in Turkey. The basis for this belief is a story published on Feb. 23 2012 by the National Turkish news service. You can read the report, which describes a 1500-2000 year old Bible seized from smugglers by Turkish police here.
This supposed ‘Bible’ is an obvious fake.
Firstly, the document was not written 1500 years ago. The document itself says it was written in the year 1500 A.D. which would make it about 500 years old, not 1500 years old. We know that the document was written in 1500 AD because it says so on the front cover. The text on the front cover has appeared in many photographs and is easily read in the Modern Assyrian language.
But the fact that the document was written in Modern Assyrian proves that the document is actually less than 200 years old. The language Modern Assyrian, was standardized in the 1840s. The first bible in Modern Assyrian was produced in 1848. If this book were written in 1500 A.D. it would have been written in Classical Assyrian, not Modern Assyrian.
More to the point, a document written in 1840 cannot possibly be said to predict the coming of Mohammed in 610 AD.
From this alone, the language that the document was written in, we therefore know that this document is an obvious fake.
Secondly, this document has been rejected as a fake by Islamic scholars. The Islamic website Islamic NewsRoom describes how the document contradicts The Qu’ran as follows (see http://www.islamnewsroom.com/news-we-need/1800-ancient-bible-proves-muhammad
In late 2012 the Turkish culture and tourism minister Ertugrul Gunay quoted from the book saying that in it, Jesus says, “How shall the Messsiah be called? Muhammad is his Blessed name”.
Yet, The Qu’ran says that Messiah is the name of Jesus, NOT the name of Mohammed.
The Islamic article goes on to describe other contradictions between the document and The Qu’ran and then closes with a quote from Yusuf Estes, the well-known Islamic scholar, who rejects the document as follows:
I’m sorry for those who believe this book is the authentic written word of Jesus, peace be upon him. The most I can say about this book other than being an ancient manuscript of somebody’s writing – it should not be seriously considered as anything more than another discovery of ancient rubbish.
No wonder the Turkish Theology professor Omer Faruk Harman told said the Turkish Newspaper Today’s Zaman, “Muslims may be disappointed to see that this copy does not include things they would like to see and it might have no relation with the content of the Gospel of Barnabas“.