Skip navigation

Muslims believe that Christians falsified and destroyed the real Bible, often asserting that this occurred at The Council Of Nicea in 325 AD.

Some Muslims believe that the supposed original, real Bible, which supports the teaching of The Qu’ran,  was discovered in the year 2000 in Turkey. The basis for this belief is a story published on Feb. 23 2012  by the National Turkish news service. You can read the report, which describes a 1500-2000 year old Bible seized from smugglers by Turkish police here.

This supposed ‘Bible’ is an obvious fake.

Firstly, the document was not written 1500 years ago. The document itself says it was written in the year 1500 A.D. which would make it about 500 years old, not 1500 years old. We know that the document was written in 1500 AD because it says so on the front cover. The text on the front cover has appeared in many photographs and is easily read in the Modern Assyrian language.

But the fact that the document was written in Modern Assyrian proves that the document is actually less than 200 years old. The language Modern Assyrian, was standardized in the 1840s. The first bible in Modern Assyrian was produced in 1848. If this book were written in 1500 A.D. it would have been written in Classical Assyrian, not Modern Assyrian.

More to the point, a document written in 1840 cannot possibly be said to predict the coming of Mohammed in 610 AD.

From this alone, the language that the document was written in, we therefore know that this document is an obvious fake.

Secondly, this document has been rejected as a fake by Islamic scholars. The Islamic website Islamic NewsRoom describes how the document contradicts The Qu’ran as follows (see http://www.islamnewsroom.com/news-we-need/1800-ancient-bible-proves-muhammad

In late 2012 the Turkish culture and tourism minister Ertugrul Gunay quoted from the book saying that in it,  Jesus says, “How shall the Messsiah be called? Muhammad is his Blessed name”.

 Yet, The Qu’ran says that Messiah is the name of Jesus, NOT the name of Mohammed.

The Islamic article goes on to describe other contradictions between the document and The Qu’ran and then closes with a quote from Yusuf Estes, the well-known Islamic scholar, who rejects the document as follows:

I’m sorry for those who believe this book is the authentic written word of Jesus, peace be upon him. The most I can say about this book other than being an ancient manuscript of somebody’s writing – it should not be seriously considered as anything more than another discovery of ancient rubbish.

http://www.islamnewsroom.com/news-we-need/1800-pope-read-ancient-bible-a-quit-why

No wonder the Turkish Theology professor Omer Faruk Harman told said the Turkish Newspaper Today’s Zaman, “Muslims may be disappointed to see that this copy does not include things they would like to see and it might have no relation with the content of the Gospel of Barnabas“.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. 1500 years ago would make it written in 500 or in the year christ died if written 2,000 years ago. “”This supposed ‘Bible’ is an obvious fake.” this is a very sandy-grounded opinion. It’s in the Turkish museum having been tested by experts. 1500AD would not make it the oldest bible.
    I’ve seen and read from a bible written in 1700 Italy and numerous details were listed that are not today listed in modern bibles. I haven’t seen in one article it written 1500AD. The other articles state 1500 years ago, vast difference!

    • baraholka1
    • Posted February 18, 2019 at 11:07 pm
    • Permalink

    Hi Jacqueline,

    Thanks for dropping by and taking the time to comment.

    This supposed Bible is not 1500 years old. The Turkish government said it was 1500 years old, but the document itself says it was written in the year 1500. The date it was supposedly written (1500 AD) is inscribed on the front cover.

    But this supposed Bible is written in Modern Assyrian. That language did not exist until 1840. So there is no way that this supposed Bible could have been written before 1840. Therefore it is less than 150 years old.

    Thirdly, this supposed Bible is erroneous. It contains a prophecy stating that the Messiah will be named Mohammed. But both Muslims and Christians agree that the Messiah is named Jesus. So this supposed Bible cannot be either a true Bible or a true “original” Injil (i.e. the supposed original real Bible said by Muslims to be Islamic an nature but corrupted by Christians and then lost).

    So both Muslims and Christians agree the document is a fraud. The well-known Islamic Scholar Yusuf Estes is just one who says so.

    For all these reasons it is clear that this supposed Bible is a fraud.

    Best Regards,
    Barra


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: